DeTune wrote:
Don't take this as a bash or argument, its just my honest humble opinion.
Likewise, not trying to put down or knock your idea but your rationale might be missing the mark at bit.
I wouldn't read into what ever Monster has done with these engines, very few if any stock parts were used in his engines, he also has access to cad files direct from Suzuki so he can easily get custom stuff made to look factory, it's in Suzuki's best interest to make it appear he uses stock parts.
As G16B_Sedan mentioned it's the rod ratio not the crank, specifically it's the piston speed in the middle of the stroke, this is the reason you can't rev a g16b, if you only want a g16 for a road car then why would you spend all that money on a stronger crank? just use a factory one, you only need a stronger crank if you are going to boost it or rev the nuts off to gain an improvement over a g13b, if you are going to boost it then you are going to change the rods for sure, forged rods will be less than 1/3 the cost of a custom crank.
As for reliable g16b twincams that rev to 9000 rpm, only a couple of guys I know that have taken their engines to that limit and both were only for a very short while before they expired, in fact 1600gti is still arguing over the engine rebuild now, the only thing I blame his engine builder for is a failure to understand physics.
4age 81mm bore x 77mm stroke
B16 81mm bore x 77.4mm stroke
G16 75mm Bore x 90mm stroke
It's quite obvious which two were designed as performance engines and the other as a cruisey high torque engine.
I suggest you talk to Blake on redline, he has done the honda crank in his g16 twincam and has a very good understanding on these engines, he also knows the guy that used to build Tajima San's g16b engines for Pikes Peak
