TeamSwift

Dude you are so right about the Electric turbo/superchargers.
Unless you are talking about an e-Ram. That's 1000 CFM's pushing down those tubes. Do you know what 1000 CFM will do for your lill engine?

Dude, you are so wrong about the fuel line magnets. This has been tested on a stationary generator with a fixed load and before/after results obtained. This is science. This is research.
This is how its done in the real world.
See the results below. They speak for themselves.

Good question, John. My Allan 5 gas analyzer gives me the AFR reading.

--- In supercarbs@y..., ibeme@m... wrote:
Uli,

This is a great post - a good objective repeatable test.
Guess that seals it for me - I've been toying with the idea
of getting a generator to play with, and just had not done
it.

Thanks for the well thought out experiment and good post.

One question however - what are you using to measure air-
fuel ratios into the 21/1 range? Most O2 sensors are not
good outside a narrow band around 14.7/1.

John

--- In supercarbs@y..., uli.xxxxxx@u... wrote:
Since I already have an engine setup for testing, I decided to
give the fuel magnet a go. Here are the results:

Test engine: Yamaha 173cc OHV four stroke engine with 2.4kw Alternator
Fuel delivery system: Vortex 618 vaporizer
Fuel: Unleaded petrol
ambient temp: 19.5 deg C
Rel. humidity: 80%
Test procedure: For each test, the engine was run with an
identical load and an identical amount of fuel. The first two runs were
done without magnets. Each run was than timed until the engine stopped
on its own. After that, 2off 70x50x25mm ferrite magnets where
strapped to either side of the rubber fuel line, with opposing poles
towards each other, about 250mm away from the float chamber of the fuel processor. Another two runs where timed under those conditions also.
For the first two runs, the time was 23 min 30sec each. The first run
with magnets was 28 min 30sec and the second one just over 27 min.
After that another run was done for verification, on which the engine
showed signs of running rich. The AFR was adjusted and a further test run performed. This time the engine went for 36 min. The AFR was measured as being 21.5/1.
When the magnets where removed, with the engine still running, the HC
reading went up immediately from 41ppm to 66 ppm. Something is going on there for sure.
I will have to further reconfirm those results, but it appears that
the magnets change the burn characteristic of the fuel to such an extent that a leaner mixture setting becomes necessary in order to
gain maximum benefits from them. The last run represents an improvement of over 50% over the first one without magnets. This is substantial. If you have fuel injection, you might want to run an EFIE together with the magnets or for a carby, maybe try smaller jets.

Uli Xxxxxx


Dude, yes and no on the hydroxiginators. Yes, in that there are plenty of scammers out there in this energy cult marketplace. No, in that not all electrolysers themselves are a scam or the results thereof. The tech on them is advancing everyday. People are learning to make them more and more efficient every day.

Dude, you are so right about the Tornado/spiralmax air restrictors.
Right ON dude!!

Sam

I read a few lines and quickly scanned down to reply...you are quite gullible and no one should pay any attention to your advice. This is a reply to NoWhere...who is certainly nowhere

i guess if CAROL SHELBY endorses it,it must be good,right guys? yeah,right!regular maintenance works for me!!

:twisted: @ Ralph, scammers will get richer as they are smarter and know that there are enough fools out there to buy and try their snake oils.

V8's
I don't care what people say, they SUCK at Gas Mileage!!!!!!

i actually got really good gas mileage in my 1986 firebird. 305 5 speed. 270k kms. 400k to a tank on the highway with the t tops off. woukd have gottn better if the engine was rebuilt and the tranny actually had a mount lol