TeamSwift

my new GT 94 whit:<br><br>header 4-1<br>muffler spor whiout cat<br>Green conic filter<br>c/r 10.3:1<br><br>power at wheels!
http://www.we-todd-did-racing.com/wetoddimage.wtdr/i=wMTMwMTU1NnM0MTNkZmQzMXk1NDE%3D

Actually I run 98 octane only....with my timing, etc, I kinda have to.<br><br>Stock Gti's here make around 55-58kW at the wheels on the typical Aussie dyno, which is usually a Dyno Dynamics type dyno. So around 73-75hp. <p></p><i></i>

Higher octane does not effect any power on our GTi's, just for the simple reason we don't have a knocksensor <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> So the ECU cannot set the timing ignition earlier untill pingin'/knocking appears. Too bad. Honda's for instance do have one and higher octane would help the ecu-controlunit to get more power.<br><br>We have to adjust the basic timing (I've seen a few crazy people here with 13 degrees basic!!<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/embarassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> )<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

13degrees ran just fine w/ 91 octane, i would have gone higher if i could get 94 everywhere i drive ... *shrugs* .. i've got a rally chip now, so there's no need for so much base anymore. <p></p><i></i>

Stock head<br>Cams (unsure what ones, bigger than bd14 smaller than Group a)<br>stock bottom end<br>filter<br>extractors 4-1<br>2inch cat back (hi flow 2 1/2 inch cat)<br>8.8mm Top gun leads standard coil<br>stock ECU<br><br>ran 59.4kw atw in 4th @ 188km/h.<br><br>The stock ecu is really holding it back atm, I have just got a new ecu with a rospen chip in it, and changed the exhaust to 2 1/2 inch press bent with a new muffler and resonator.<br><br>On a dyno dynamics dyno in shootout mode <p></p><i></i>

you definetaly need ecu and bigger exhaust waylow.<br>and your cams seem to start making power after 5500rpm up until 8000rpm<br>your AFR was all over the place. <p></p><i></i>

Here is my dyno run, 08/03: With a 16% drivetrain loss, It works out to about 120 crank hp....and my port/polish head, cam gears and cams are sitting in the garage...waiting...patiently....<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.jufa.ca/Kuzuki/Dyno/Aug%2003.pdf" target="top">www.jufa.ca/Kuzuki/Dyno/Aug%2003.pdf</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>K & N Filter<br>3" Intake Pipe<br>56 mm MAF<br>60 mm TB<br>Cultus Intake Manifold<br>Aurora Ignition<br>ESR 4-2-1 Headers<br>2.25" Mandrel Bent Exhaust, no Cat<br>Tom's Chip<br>8 Degrees Base Timing<br>Underdrive Pulley<br><br> <p><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://jufa.ca/kuzuki/index.htm" target="top">My Suzuki 1.3 GT</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub83.ezboard.com/bteamswift.showUserPublicProfile?gid=drkuzuki>Dr Kuzuki</A> at: 8/21/03 11:55 am<br></i>

gti tranny ratio. up a couple posts. i mentioned something about 4th gear being 1:1 the slowuzkis are to my surprise. 4th and 5th are overdriven <p>MURR<br>Racing... Because other sports require only 1 ball</p><i></i>

I forgot to mention I run a SOHC gearbox <p></p><i></i>

My Mk1 timing is not ecu-controlled and my dizzy is radically recurved with 14 degrees base and twenty degrees total advance all-in at 5000rpm or so.<br><br>Waylow, if your cams are in between the BD14 and Group A grinds and have 258deg and .340 lift then the actual grind number is 553/D2. You certainly need a better tuned setup to run these cams...they are what I have been using the past two or three years. <p></p><i></i>

my car made 62.2fwkw at 6700-6800rpm<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br>mods 4-1 exhaust and 2in mandrel bend<br>60mmtb and no maf<br>aftermarket computer.<br>prmium leads and 9<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/nerd.gif ALT="8o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ctane<br>did 15.8 second 1/4 mile with 16in chromes, big front bar and was around 860kg at the time (with me in it)<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

that is 97+1 octane, on 4th gear<br><br><br>and how did this other gti make 141hp with similer mods to mine?<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>what hp at fly wheel is 62fwkw? <p></p><i></i>

62 kw is about 84 hp. That puts you in the 95 hp range at the flywheel.<br><br>I would expect there to be normal variation in power output on the stock motor, but that seems typical from what I have heard.<br><br>For comparison, Kyle's stock turbo motor (without the turbo) put down about 86 hp, while mine put down 95 at the wheels. Both engines had the benefit of a 2.25" cat-free exhaust and a removed airbox. <p></p><i></i>

i recently put my 97gti on the dyno. i have a full exhaust system includin extractors, diff cam rods and alot more little stuff.<br>its pretty stock but i got 97.6kw at the wheels <p></p><i></i>

I need a better stock motor man... Everybody NA whopped the butt of my crappy motor. 10hp@wheels difference with same mods on same dyno. I was happy for Scott, yet not happy at the same time. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:xx-small;"><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Kyle Jones<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.angelfire.com/de/ksj/myswift.html"><br>Junk-Yard Turbo set-up, formerly NOS-fed, constantly evolving 1989 Suzuki Swift</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></span><!--EZCODE FONT END--><br><br></p><i></i>

Hi,<br> I have two dyno printouts for you. One with a peak of 108hp is with a GTI modified with cultus pistons, 49 mm throttle body, headers and a BD14 cam. The other is with individual throttle bodies and a motec which gave 113 hp. <br><br>P.S. I will have to e-mail it individually as I cannot figure out how to include pictures using this forum <p></p><i></i>

My results are

157Whp
140 ft.lbs torque @12lbs boost

going back this weekend to 14lbs

does anyone have any figues higher than this?
if so what boost

here is my dyno sheet...